![animal liberation front france animal liberation front france](https://veganfeministnetwork.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/happenning_269_life___crow_cotton_branding_by_xandrah_octopus-d8fql9n.jpg)
It involves a three-place predicate that relates to certain subject and object.
![animal liberation front france animal liberation front france](https://animalliberationpressoffice.org/NAALPO/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/France_hack_June17b-300x196.jpg)
Moral responsibility has the following formula: “subject S is morally responsible (i.e., blameworthy or praiseworthy) to degree d for object O” ( Khoury, 2017, p. Responsibility for one's actions is one of the most important concepts in ethics, and it is strictly connected to the issue of blameworthiness and praiseworthiness.
![animal liberation front france animal liberation front france](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/71gZNJjaglL._AC_UL320_.jpg)
Thus, I present the concept of responsibility present in previous animal/environmental ethics discussions 1. Only radical responsibility covers all ranges of animal uses that are present in Western culture-those presented as explicite as well as those presented as implicite in our daily lives. In this opinion piece, I claim that radical responsibility is conducive as a tool to direct our actions so that they minimize the suffering of non-human animals derived from those actions. Only then can cruel practices be limited. From this point of view, I assume that we should look at non-human animals not from a human-related perspective but from a suffering-related one ( Nussbaum, 2004), as suggested by ( Bentham, 2000 – first edition 1781). And many of these uses require inflicting a great deal of pain on animals” ( La Folette, 1989, p. As La Follette said, “we are part of a culture which rather cavalierly uses animals for food, clothes, for research in the development of new drugs, and to determine the safety of household products or cosmetics.